Why is it a good thing to decipher different golf swing styles? How can deeper understanding help your own development?

Understanding your, our your student’s, swing style will give you many nice benefits:

• It makes it less likely to “take someone else’s medicine”. In other words it helps you not to “harm” yourself with wrongly chosen advice.
• It gives you the ability to spring clean your mind and gain focus in your development (spend less time on irrelevant stuff).
• It provides the foundation for finding information and concepts that actually aid you.
• And the golf nerd one: It’s just fun to know stuff 🙂

In other words, this is all about creating clear contextual knowledge. You’ve likely heard me write “what you see isn’t what you do” which is basically a reference to that golf swings are the outcomes of inner driving intentions. Understanding your swing style can aid you in your search for how you can alter these intentions if needed.

Obviously these are all subjective analysis from my own point of view (the outcome of 10+ years research in golf). Even though I know that not every single information line in this articles is 100% factually correct, I know that it provides enough context to achieve the four mentioned points.

Perspective 1 – Knowing (or not) your power source

Ultimately everything in golf boils down to power in one way or another. I have a deeper article about power about it here. The power styles I’ve come across over the years are the following::

• Not knowing your power source and delivering bad golf. This is usually all over the top players and in general inconsistent strikers. The power journey isn’t clear and the body just reacts to an undefined task. In my opinion, you don’t swing over the top because you want it, but because that’s the option you’ve given yourself. This is the realm of most major swing flaws in golf.
• Not knowing your power source and being pretty good. Most of these golfers started golf early and learned to create natural power when they were pretty weak. They had no other choice but to create a decent power mechanism. I used to be this player and it took me down to 1 in hcp. Here you also have a bunch of swing flaws readily observable.
• Knowing your power through an Ax. The concept is that you utilize the abstract concept of axing the golf ball. This leads to the dynamics of losing touch with the club during the lag-phase of the downswing and then stimulating the strike in a singular point before, at or after the ball. This is a great way of producing power and many golfers will come down to scratch (or even better) with it. this is a very deliberate creation of lag.
• Knowing your power through a Whip. This is a more relaxed form of the Ax where you more than often culminate your power after the golf ball. This leads to the need for a blade closing mechanism before the whip component is executed (otherwise you get an open blade). This is also the realm of intended lag usage.
• Knowing your power through Tire Smashing. This old school technique was pioneered by English coaches (I think) and is about shutting down the face with the forearms together with stimulating centrifugal force. This is a potent skill set that has a very clear training form (tire smashing..). This also emphasizes the usage of lag to store power.
• Knowing your power through a Sling. This I believe is the outcome of trying to never fully release the club but to block out the shot with a massive body inspired sling action. Think Dustin Johnson and you’ve got it. It’s a very baseball inspired motion. The sling power mechanic doesn’t utilize lag as a key component.
• Knowing your power through Using the Swing Arc. This is what the old timers did before equipment made it possible to use other styles of power. It’s, in my opinion, the smoothest, most consistent and easiest to learn power style (if you know what to do). The swing arc power also doesn’t use lag as a key component (even though it might look like lag)

If you start thinking about your power style it can really help you to navigate which advice to listen to and which not to. Fundamentally all tips involving the skill set of developing your power mechanism will trump any e.g. “biomechanics” golf tip out there.

Perspective 2 – Downswing Arc Usage

How you use the swing arc can also be a dead give away to which style of swing you are performing (with or without clear intentional targets). The goal of the downswing arc is to present a shallow enough strike to harness the goodies of an optimal impact (for your above mentioned power source).

• Narrow 2 plane over the top swinger. This is you that actually go ahead and steepen your downswing plane without shallowing out the golf club. Most of these golfers will hit big slices or in the general pull region of golf shots. Most of the time they will, over time, work in a very strong lead hand grip to accommodate the swing path (out to in) and eventually start aiming loads to the right (for a righty player). This mostly lines up with the “not knowing your power” perspective in the previous segment. 
• Narrow 2 plane plane swinger – dumping the upper body. Most of these golfers have solved their over the top problem through letting the upper body fall too much in the downswing. This would be most 2 way miss players and this aligns very much with not having a defined power source. 
• Narrow 2 plane swing – shallowing the club. This swing style can take you to the tour if you’re good enough. It’s basically solving the “shallowing need” in the difficult-to-navigate-mentally-transition and presents a nice impact opportunity once successful. It can be solved with either early transition forearm rotation which then matches up with a more “tire smashing” power focus. You can also try to extend your trail arm manually which would match much better with an ax motion. Lastly if you actually go ahead and shallow the club whilst also closing it the matching can be made towards the whip concept. Either motions, in my opinion, are hard to perform.
• Wide 2 plane wide swinger. This is the realm of the baseball inspired motion that made its way into golf the last 20 years (read this article about swing evolution). When you go ahead and keep a wide arm structure in the downswing whilst heavily manipulating the club with your forearms and wrists to set up the following: That you outrace your arms with your body and create a stretch in all relevant muscles. The sling is then inspired by the massive rotational effects of the body.
• Wide 1 plane swinger. There is a much easier way. You actually don’t have to manipulate your swing plane at all if you actually go ahead and use the downswing arc to your advantage. This style is what the old timers used and it’s simply about creating power with the arc instead of another source. This creates the advantage of “free shallowness” and limited swing plane manipulation. Hence, it’s the easiest form of downswing arc usage and it originates from actually intentionally knowing and using your downsizing arc power source. (and I’m not talking about Moe Norman’s version here but a more “normal downswing arc usage”)

An example of the benefit of looking here for answers is: If you are a narrow 2 plane over the top swinger and you take the advice that you “need to rotate your body more” you’ve taken medicine from the wide 2 plane swinger bracket and you will become worse at ball striking.

Perspective 3 – Hit, Sling or Swing

What I’m after here is the separation of golf motions in relation to a more holistic feel perspective where you as an observer can start thinking about if you have a motion that hits, slings or swings. Why is this important? Again, it’s all about knowing who you are so that you can start digging down the rabbit holes of the swing style that symbolizes your movement.

(for you that have a TGM interest and knowledge I’m not talking about this the TGM hitter or swing terminology here)

• A hitter in golf is someone that performs a motion that seems to have a very clear ending point way before the finish position. It feels a little bit like there is a lot of wasted potential in the movement. If you find yourself in this region and this is the way that you wish to play golf then you should look at development in an either ax or whip like motion where you train your 2 plane back-/downswing to become much more shallow. I will however say, and I’m VERY biased, that the 1 plane wide downswing arc and the swing arc power source is an easier development for you.
  • Professional examples that showcase some of this would be e.g. Tommy Fleetwood or why not Alex Norén.
• The slinger is someone that goes ahead and uses their body primarily to really create huge separation and more “hit a baseball shot in golf”. You see this on TV all the time and you also see 23 year olds withdrawing from events with back injuries…
  • Professional examples like DJ, Victor Hovland or Joaquin Niemann.
• The swinger is someone where you get the feeling that they are harmonic and in connection with the club throughout the entire swing. It feels like they are utilizing the complete downswing all the way to the follow through to harmonize power.
  • Professional examples like Ludvig Åberg, Xander Schauffele or why not Scottie Scheffler. And basically everyone before the 1980s.

Summary – Deciphering Golf Swing Styles

This article is all about gaining knowledge of what you’re doing today. If you comprehend this then you can more easily go down the road where solutions are readily available. Having accomplish 5 swing changes the last 10 years (read my story here) has led me to many conclusions and this is one of the more important ones: Understand where you are today, where you want to go and why you want to go there. The mile high context I have written about can provide you answers for these questions.

Swing Knowledge and Flaw Articles

Golf Development Consulting

I offer some services for you that are into golf technique and want some assistance.

Main Content Pages

Old School Swinging Articles (from Golf’s Best Systems)

The FMM Swing Video Posts

The FMM Swing Articles